Letter of Rep. Bob Morris to Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb
		  Dear  Governor Holcomb:
          I have  been considering a matter that once was resolved in my heart – the matter of  Indiana Capital Punishment. I have long supported the right – indeed the  obligation – of the State to exact punishment in this extreme form. I always  believed that it was the duty of the State to exact on earth a punishment that  was just in the context of the committed crime.  
            Over the  course of the past several months, but especially over the past several weeks,  I have been praying about this and I have been reading discourses from church  leaders, historic figures, and philosophers. The recent Supreme Court decision  to return the matter of abortion to each state and Indiana’s Special Session  thereafter resulted in tremendous upheaval in my heart regarding the value of  every human life. My view of this issue is driven by my faith. I believe only  one position honors Our Lord and Savior, our Creator: to protect all human  life. 
            Human  life is sacred. It must be so. It is sacred because from its beginning it  involves the creative action of God, and each life remains forever in a special  relationship with the Creator. But life cannot be sacred in one instance and  not sacred in another. If we begin deciding when life is sacred versus when it  is not sacred, our culture finds only regret. Committed to the Truth regarding  life as sacred, then we should also say that every human life exists by the holy  will of God Almighty, and that sacredness extends from the moment of conception  until the final natural breath. 
            But it  is more than that. I have been considering the harm caused by the  administration of Capital Punishment. Who are the people who transport the  prisoner to be executed? Who escorts him to the execution room and seats the  prisoner? Who manufactures the drugs that are to be administered? Who fills the  syringe? Who injects the poison? Are not each of these unique individuals, by  default, pulled into the act of the human execution? Execution is not an  anonymous action. It involves many participants. In fact, a state which  executes convicted criminals involves every citizen in the execution which is  done in their name. This unnecessarily involves those who oppose capital  punishment on religious grounds. In our society today, capital punishment of  the imprisoned is not necessary in our day for the protection of the innocent  citizens.
            Furthermore,  consider that the specific act of sentencing has changed substantially. In  2002, Indiana made a consequential change to the way in which capital crimes  are sentenced. Prior to 2002, a judge alone decided the sentence. After 2002, a  jury decided the sentence. I make no claim regarding a jury’s likelihood to  sentence a convicted criminal to death. But the resolution of a group of one’s  peers, tempered by more than one personal view, should be viewed as a moral  improvement. Is the fate of prisoners on Indiana’s Death Row who were sentenced  before 2002 marginalized because they were sentenced not by a jury of their  peers but by a single man or woman acting as judge? Is their death sentence  more or less just as the result of the sentencing process that has since been  changed?   
            To a  degree, I discount this “judge vs. jury” issue because, in the final analysis,  one man has no moral right to execute another man who is already subdued,  convicted, and safely confined.
            Some of  the most celebrated writing of Western Civilization, which spans 2,500 years  and includes greats such as Augustine of Hippo to John Paul II, agrees with the  following: if a prisoner can be reliably confined and if the public is made  safe, then execution is not an appropriate sentence. A life in state  confinement does not have to be slothful or indulgent. Prisoners can be made to  be active, productive, and to have meaningful discourse in a humane existence.  This is a manner of punishment that fears God, that honors Him, and that  maintains public safety. 
            I ask  you, Governor Holcomb, to protect all Hoosiers from the consequences of error,  from the consequences of continuing what was begun by others without thought,  and from the irreparable moral damage resulting from imprudence and haste. You  are given an opportunity to change course, at least temporarily. I pray that  you have the courage and the wisdom to act boldly. If you do nothing more, it  is enough to protect human life. All life. Today.
            Please,  at minimum, delay the execution of all Indiana capital punishment until after  the General Assembly has reconvened and has had a chance to consider this grave  matter.
            Thank  you for your consideration of this request. 
          Sincerely,
          Bob Morris 
           
          Related story: Catholic lawmaker aims to outlaw state death penalty